Impossible Coincidences: Part 2
The same page.
The first installment of Impossible Coincidences” focused on the page numbers.
This installment begins with something more important.
The content.
The image above shows two versions of Page 3 of the same dismissal summary. (It should be noted that the entire eight pages of this dismissal summary follow the same irregularities. Placing all eight pages in this forum would likely just add confusion.)
Notice what matches.
The hospital.
The admission date.
The dismissal date.
Even the page number.
Page 3 of 8.
Everything suggests these should be the same page.
Yet they are not.
The text immediately below the page number does not align.
The content itself has shifted.
At first glance, that may appear insignificant.
It is not.
Now we look at the last page of the dismissal, page eight.
Now on page eight the content has shifted back. Both documents are following the same storyline.
The page number region is still misaligned.
The body text is still misaligned.
Yet the actual sentence content at this location appears to be the same.
If someone were simply replacing the document with a newer version, you’d expect the content differences and spacing to continue all the way through. In other words, if the content on the first example has differing words, then the words on page 8 shouldn't not end the same…but they do.
So, instead:
some pages differ
some pages align
some content changes
some content stays the same
signatures remain fixed
print dates change
page-number alignment changes
Now we are no longer examining the medical event.
We are looking at the history of a document.
There are now three separate questions:
Question 1
Why are the page-number regions and body text misaligned?
That’s a document-generation question.
Question 2
Why do some pages contain different substantive content?
That’s a narrative question.
Question 3
Why does the same electronic signature appear attached to versions that are not identical?
And specific to page eight, being misaligned on the page number, holding both pages together and put to a light the bottom electronic signature sits identically on the page as does the printed date at the very bottom with the exception one was printed on “10-Jan-2013” (day of Rico’s release) and the other was printed on “11-Jan-2013.”
These were documents that were turned into the legal action to abduct Rico.





The HIV/AIDS allopathic medical and tragic legal farce is riddled with misalignments, fudged facts, dishonestly, cruel manipulation and outcomes, with the intention of convincing physicians, 'public servants', judges/juries, unwitting victims/patients and the distracted masses that HIV causes AIDS when it's actually a very strategic coincidence and simply an opportunistic infection - and usually not even deadly. Very profitable for some: very costly for others. A very queer community indeed, with drugs at its epicentre - and misplaced pride. Arrogance and pride - flip-sides of the same seductive coin!